Skirts and Ladders 'Computing is too important to be left to men' — Karen Spärck Jones

17Oct/090

“Diversity is not about how we differ. Diversity is about embracing one another’s uniqueness.” Ola Joseph

Diversity in investment banks is a contentious issue. I tend to focus my attention on graduate recruitment, because it's the easiest way to see what the demographics of the future workforce will be like.

I have a friend that joined the technology graduate scheme of one large American bank a couple years ago, and was part of an intake that was at least 70% white male. My friend, a white woman, joined the most unexpected team in that firm.

The team was founded by another woman. This woman went on to build her team, and after a couple years, when my friend had joined, this was the breakdown:

Count Disability Ethnicity Sexuality Gender
2 dyslexic White straight women
1 White straight woman
1 dyslexic White straight man

The next incarnation of this team involved the man relocating to New York, and a new graduate coming on board. Yes, we have arrived at an all-women team - in IT!

Count Disability Ethnicity Sexuality Gender
2 dyslexic White straight women
1 White straight woman
1 Chinese straight woman

And guess what - the best is yet to come. Because my friend, that 1 white woman, is moving on. Let's introduce her replacement, as well as this year's new graduate.

Count Disability Ethnicity Sexuality Gender
2 dyslexic White straight women
1 Chinese straight woman
2 White gay men

There's something fantastical about this team. Shouldn't there be a token straight, white man?

It's easy to understand how it started, because it comes down to the key problem with diversity: everyone wants to hire people like them. This is not out of malice or (reverse) discrimination, it's because we generally feel more comfortable with people that have something in common with us.

Dyslexia's an interesting thing to appear in this mix, because it's a fairly hidden disability - given that it's estimated that 10% of the population is dyslexic, there should be thousands of such people employed by all of these large firms, and yet I'm sure most people aren't aware of their dyslexic colleagues.

And that leaves us with women and gay men. There are many, many variables at work, but given that women and gay men are few and far between on technology grad schemes, it's interesting to watch them gravitate into this specific team. Is it the job? The manager? The team? For once, I'm interested in the flip side: why are the stereotypical straight, white men not ending up here?

6Oct/092

“The Problem is Really in the Environment” – Anthony Greenwald

I started a new job a couple months ago and had to undergo diversity training, as is the norm for all new joiners. While the session was fairly typical, the discussion on bias versus prejudice led to our instructor telling us to Google the Harvard Implicit Association Test to see what our individual bias is like. She said that while she had thought that she knew how she was biased, she was surprised by how strong the test showed her responses to be.

Of course, I took a look. I went straight for the Gender - Science IAT demo which tests for a relative link between liberal arts and females and between science and males. Ten minutes later I was told, "Your data suggest a slight association of Male with Science and Female with Liberal Arts compared to Female with Science and Male with Liberal Arts." I even got a pretty graph to go with it:

respondent breakdown

The FAQs tell me a 'slight' effect is one that is noticeable in statistical analysis, but you may not have been aware of it. I'm not sure if this makes it better or worse. There are two reasons why implicit attitudes don't agree with explicit attitudes (and I hope at this point it isn't unreasonable to assume that my explicit attitude is that women are just as likely to be associated with science as men - that is, I believe I have a neutral attitude: neither gender is better nor worse):

  1. The person is unwilling to admit their implicit attitude, e.g. out of embarrassment.
  2. The person is unable to admit their implicit attitude, because they are not aware of their implicit negativity.

So I'm either lying, or my subconscious just spoke up.

I took the time to think about it properly a couple days after taking the test, and as horrible as it is to admit, I think it may well be the former. It's not that I think that men are more naturally suited to science, it's that the world we live in grooms them for it and they get the advantages that women don't. The reality is that the adult men I know tend to be more proficient at science and technology than the women, because they have had a lifetime nurturing that ability, while the women have had the opposite. Here's hoping that changes!

Tagged as: 2 Comments
14Sep/090

“We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done.” – Alan Turing

Another day, another list. Today it's the third Financial News 100 list of the most influencial women in finance. I was pleased to see the names of three women from my current firm, and another three from my former employer. That's good representation, even if the soundbites for all are a bit short. Financial News have stated their criteria for choosing these women up front, but the blurb about them could be taken from LinkedIn for all that they tell us about what each woman has achieved above and beyond the normal course of work. Why are they listed instead of their peers? Or is it perhaps the case that these are not the top 100, but the only 100?

Seeing I can't focus on any of those women as a shining example of why women should be in the workforce, it feels appropriate that the spotlight should be on a man for change.

I'm sure a lot of people didn't know who Alan Turing was a mere week ago, but having studied computer science at university, I was promptly introduced to his name. It must be said that 'The History of Computing' rarely touches on homosexuality, so that part of the story was left unsaid. But the brilliance of Turing, all that he accomplished and contributed was covered in more detail than most of us found necessary. I studied finite state automata, artificial intelligence and cryptanalysis and there he was in all of it.

The Number 10 petition was the first time that I became aware that he was more than the name behind those dreaded Turing machines, universal or otherwise. I never believed that anything would come of it, having seen many petitions come and go, so it was a great surprise when 10pm last Thursday night rolled around. The Twitter traffic alone kept me up for far too long that night, and it was even more pleasing to see Dr Sue Black being corralled by the media for many interviews on Turing, and by proxy, his work at Bletchley.

I focus on women in this blog, because that's what I know and care about, but it's fundamentally necessary to acknowledge and include all people, no matter what the difference in question is for us to move forward. Yes, the actions taken against him were in line with the law at the time. But that doesn't make it right or any better to ignore. Some critics want a broader apology, to each and every individual who suffered in prison or with the effects of chemical castration, but I think the statement was just right as it was.

It is thanks to men and women who were totally committed to fighting fascism, people like Alan Turing, that the horrors of the Holocaust and of total war are part of Europe's history and not Europe's present. So on behalf of the British government, and all those who live freely thanks to Alan's work, I am very proud to say: we're sorry. You deserved so much better.

6Sep/090

“We all should know that diversity makes for a rich tapestry.” – Maya Angelou

I get asked why the continual focus on diversity is so important, especially when, as a young professional, it's easy to see that the big companies have got the message and are hiring increasingly diverse candidates. Unfortunately, it's sometimes to the point of being too diverse, with the majority of the population barely being represented.

So what is diversity? Hiring enough women / minorities / LGBT / disabled individuals so that no one's moaning anymore? And why is diversity so difficult to achieve? Why do we have whole departments within HR devoted to diversity, inclusion & equality? How are diversity consultancy firms making so much money from helping companies make the baby steps along the way?

Main Entry: di·verse

1. Differing one from another.
2. Made up of distinct characteristics, qualities, or elements

In business, diversity is about representing the population, because that's the target market. Obviously, the niche that a product or service is aimed at will be distorted from the general population, but minority groups always find their way in, and it has to be shown that you can cater to their interests better than anyone else.

It's not about hiring a certain number of individuals that fit a certain box. It's about hiring a lot of different people so that you have knowledge of all the boxes.

What's so difficult about doing that?

It is a simple fact that people hire people that are like them. Your employees are the people that you will interact with day in and day out, and at the end of the day, you want to hire someone you have something in common with.

Unfortunately, that doesn't make a great team. No individual excels at everything. We all have annual objectives and development plans that try to overcome the greatest issues, but ultimately there are areas that are lacking, and this is where someone needs to be hired with contrasting viewpoints and experiences that can enhance the team's collective credibility.

The business case for diversity goes beyond that, as numerous studies have shown that employee satisfaction, productivity and retention need to be improved as diversity increases. This is where HR and the consultants come in, because hiring the right people is only the first step. It's pointless if they don't stay. Unfortunately, the traditional methods of doing this tend to be at the exclusion of the so-called non-diverse individuals, through specific employee networks, events, etc. They do all claim to be inclusive, but that message hasn't sunk in yet.

There's clearly a long way to go. And that is why we need to keep working at it, because the job is done when this is seamless: when the right people are hired without having to go to the conscious effort of hiring someone different; when they fit into the firm naturally and their talent is leveraged by all without a special forum needing to be set up; and when none of that is a reason for them to consider leaving.

Filed under: diversity, women No Comments
12Aug/090

“If you don’t drive your business, you will be driven out of business.” – B. C. Forbes

What do you think of when you think of Forbes? Media, business, rich lists.

ForbesWoman_170What do you get when you go to ForbesWoman? Top 10 Skinny Food Myths, The 'New' Sexual Harrassment, Moms Connect on the Internet. In all fairness, I judged very harshly on the first but when the latter two scrolled across I wondered why even the inclusion of the word 'Forbes' isn't enough to change the focus of 'Woman' to the successful businesswoman.

Ironically, the reason I was on ForbesWoman at all was because I had been pointed to a Q&A they had posted a few weeks ago with Jill Lee, Siemens' first chief diversity officer. She has a solid background with experience in global CFO positions and then moved to the so-called softer side.

She's not the first to do so. Most of the great corporates have diversity offices, sitting outside of HR with a mandate that goes further than recruiting a diverse employee base but also focusing on attracting a diverse client base. Diversity is good for business.

I went to a talk by Merrill Lynch's MD of Diversity & Inclusion, Subha Barry, when I worked there. Apart from the usual statements, she went on to say that her goal for the role was to hand it over to a white man - because this isn't only for the minorities to champion. It's well recognised that women need the support of men to further their agendas in the long run, but a quick Google of diversity officers will result in a long line of women's names.

But diversity is good for business. Why ignore part of the population when looking for clients?

Or does it come back to the job itself? The word diversity has connotations of HR and non-revenue generating back office activities. It's an area that women have traditionally dominatated, and men, for once, haven't. The only difference is that men aren't fighting the imbalance, because it's not (yet) an area that they care about.

Will their interest ever be piqued? Or will the day come when we accept that these imbalances are just the way things are?